Dear editor:
Thank you for the letter, “NIMBY attitude in NOTL is nothing new,” by Tony Giordano on July 11.
As Mr. Giordano observes, change is not new, but is unstoppable despite predictable opposition by arguably minority groups, (albeit with a loud collective voice).
Groups who follow a common lineage and share a NIMBY attitude —and were formerly known locally as Citizens Against Virtually Everything (CAVE) — have a short memory.
In building Queens Landing, King’s Point, etc. was it OK to ask for zoning amendments, but for current projects such as hotels it is not?
Lydia Madonia’s letter, “Let’s focus on realistic solutions, not just opposition,” (June 26) quotes Einstein: “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results.”
This sounds familiar: Too much noise, traffic, parking etc. Current arguments are distracting and play on the semantics of what is “five-star” focused on the Forbes definition.
This ignores the fact that although Forbes is arguably the only independent definition, there are a plethora of other definitions, some of which maybe more applicable and in line with the proposed hotel developments.
Change is inevitable.
We need entrepreneurial developers, elected councillors and, yes, advisory groups to shape this going forward but the process must be conducted with respect for the rules, (and the ability to amend them), the process and, most importantly, respect for each other.
Opposition is an embedded right but please de-personalize the discussion, (i.e. no name-calling, hurtful comments and vitriol). Let’s all move forward with decorum to bring the community together and enjoy the gift of where we live.
If people don’t like what council is doing, (councillors who work long hours for cents on the dollar) stand for council or vote accordingly in the next election. But respect the process and the fact they have been elected.
On a positive note, I recently had a long conversation with a member of SORE, an organization with whom I respectfully disagree.
Our differences of opinion did not change but the conversation was mutually respectful and appreciated.
Bonita Cawker
NOTL