
Letter: Residents association needs to show it deserves NOTL’s support
“They need to work for our votes, not become subservient to the existing municipal government,” writes Gienek Ksiazkiewicz.

“They need to work for our votes, not become subservient to the existing municipal government,” writes Gienek Ksiazkiewicz.

“Please keep pursuing this noble cause and the industry awards I am sure will continue to pile up,” writes Cal Cochrane.

“While we citizens don’t all have your platform to present our views, we should still make our voices heard and our intentions known,” writes Al Sproule.

“Your arguments against bullying are in fact arguments for more democracy at the municipal level, something which is, and will always be, necessary,” writes Shirley Worsley.

“Isn’t the heritage committe’s main function to designate and preserve historical homes and buildings?” writes Tony Giordano.

“In a time when politicians openly criticize and diminish the media and limit access to information, a free press is our best recourse to hold those in power accountable for their actions,” writes Stewart Hall.

“In my opinion (with the exception of two councillors), this town council is the worst council led by Mr. Zalepa, in terms of criticism, public input and the lack of transparency,” writes Derek Collins.

“When was the last time that he wrote a column pertaining to an issue involving only Queenston?” writes Ron Fritz.

“Pickleball is not a nuisance. It is a legitimate, healthy, community-building activity enjoyed by residents of all ages, particularly seniors who depend on it for exercise, social connection, and overall well-being,” writes Vince Serratore.

“Understanding the unique challenges of insuring these properties helps us better appreciate the complexities involved in preserving and protecting them and helps place these costs in proper perspective,” writes Debra Rowe.

“I don’t understand how criticism, questionings or requests for public documents can encourage abuse, and create an unsafe and disrespectful workplace,” writes Gienek Ksiazkiewicz.

“The residents could fill a book as thick as ‘War and Peace’ with the past decade of poor administration decisions and their fiduciary duties to spend out taxes wisely,” writes Samuel Young.

“If we truly want a better Niagara-on-the-Lake, we need fewer echo chambers — and more courage to hear the full story,” writes Maria Mavridis.

“His obsession with the Shaw and the real estate market is not only repetitive — it’s downright boring,” writes Liz McElheran.

“With amalgamation, we will get quicker development of the airport expansion and won’t have to listen to this group’s agenda items like ‘climate adaption and community resilience’ — what?” writes Peter Rusin.

“I hope I’m wrong, and that things will change,” writes Terry Davis. “And that NOTL will continue to be a wonderful place to live, work and visit.”

“I’ve lived in the village of Queenston for nearly two decades, and I never cease to be amazed at the kindness and generosity of my neighbours,” writes Linda Fritz.

“Are we only pro-immigration because people are fleeing persecution or hunger? Would immigration be immoral if they were not?” writes Alexander Evans.

“To pass negative judgement of the hoarding around the site, and its design, would seem unnecessary, indeed trival,” writes Peter Rand.

“When decisions are driven by stronger powers and historic towns respond individually, compromise tends to be one-sided,” writes Bruce Gitelman.

“Requests for access to the town’s public documents that could confirm the existence of a variety of problematic items related to council’s decisions, such as infrastructure deficiencies … are rebuffed/seemingly withheld,” writes Gienek Ksiazkiewicz.

“As U.S. President Donald Trump’s crusade to have all North American cars manufactured exclusively in the U.S. proceeds, Canada needs to replace those defunct jobs. And, we have to start somewhere,” writes J. Richard Wright.

“The Department of National Defence directorate of aviation requirements has consistently and recently made it clear that the F-35 is the aircraft type that best meets Canada’s defence requirements,” writes Kenn Moody.

“It reflects a distinctly Canadian understanding of professionalism: that public trust rests not only on rules, but on conscience,” writes Stuart McCormack.

“Governments could channel ‘happy death’ through the entire medical and social system, and take minimum responsibility for these programs,” writes Kevin McCabe.

© All Rights Reserved, Niagara Now.

